See why your competitor feels faster.
nimo follows one workflow: Find the gap. Explain why. Fix or hand off. Watch the result. Paste your URL, then pick suggested or prefilled competitors, or type the competitor pages yourself. You get a proof report that shows who is faster on LCP, why, and the first safe fix to review or hand off, with source labels, public LCP trend direction, visual proof when safe screenshots exist, weekly watch context, and Markdown or PDF export when someone needs the proof.
Result preview
Winner, reason, public LCP trend, visual proof, platform path, handoff.
Interest
Answer the competitive speed question in one proof report.
Most tools make you inspect charts before you can explain the problem. nimo starts with the winner, the reason, and the first fix to hand off, then keeps source labels and metrics visible for anyone who wants the detail. When public CrUX history exists, it adds source-labeled LCP momentum without turning the report into a dashboard. When visual proof is available, the report also shows the screenshot gap in plain language.
Which page wins
A plain LCP leaderboard across your page and competitor pages, with every compared URL visible and six-month public LCP trend direction when history exists.
Why they win
Simple proof facts show source labels, page weight, JavaScript weight, requests, third parties, TTFB, render-blocking work, and visual proof when screenshots are safe.
What to fix first
One owner, likely impact, acceptance check, weekly watch context, and a safe handoff that names the WordPress, Shopify, Webflow, Next.js, or Cloudflare path when the stack is clear.
Desire
Turn a vague speed complaint into shareable proof.
The comparison is built for the moment someone asks whether your page is slower than theirs. You get an answer that is simple enough to send and specific enough for a safe first change, with public LCP momentum when it helps show whether the gap is only today's result or part of a longer pattern, and screenshots when they help explain why the faster page feels ready sooner.
Use suggestions when you have a domain but not a clean competitor list.
Use prefilled comparison pages as a starting point, then edit the URLs before running.
Use it after a fix to show whether the LCP gap actually closed.
Use source-labeled six-month public LCP trends to see whether either side is improving, flat, or getting slower, then use Lighthouse for same-day fix checks.
Use visual proof to show when the competitor becomes useful sooner, then use the metrics to decide what to fix.
Use source labels to know when CrUX field data and Lighthouse lab data disagree.
Use platform quick wins to translate the first fix into WordPress, Shopify, Webflow, Next.js, or Cloudflare language instead of generic audit jargon.
Run the comparison before the speed gap gets harder to explain.
Start with a suggestion, a prefilled URL, or one competitor you already know. nimo will show who wins, why, and the first platform-aware fix to share, with public LCP trend direction when available and visual proof when safe screenshots are available.
Tool comparisons: compare nimo with PageSpeed Insights or GTmetrix.
Just audit my site instead